(Bloomberg) -- The Bank of Japan may raise its assessment of the economy for the first time since July 2006, even after a report yesterday showed a record contraction in the first quarter.
Gross domestic product shrank at an annual 15.2 percent pace, the government said yesterday, the steepest drop since records began in 1955. That may represent the worst of the recession and Governor Masaaki Shirakawa’s board will maintain its policy at a meeting ending tomorrow, economists say.
Shirakawa said last week that a “moderate” recovery is likely as exports and production improve, indicating the central bank may be reluctant to expand its purchases of corporate and government debt. The risk is that the policy board underestimates the threat posed by price declines that could smother an economic revival.
The bank “could go much further, expanding its balance sheet more aggressively in order to boost activity and lift the economy out of deflation,” said Ben Eldred, an economist at Daiwa Securities SMBC Co. in London. “But there is no sign that it’s prepared to do so. The result is likely to be a more muted recovery and a protracted period of falling prices.”
Policy makers will hold the overnight lending rate at 0.1 percent tomorrow, according to all 24 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. The bank may consider adding foreign currency- denominated assets to the collateral it accepts from lenders to guard against further financial-market turmoil, the Nikkei newspaper reported this week, without citing sources.
May Resume Growing
Reports in the past month suggest growth may resume this quarter. Confidence among consumers rose to a 10-month high in April. Exports increased in March from a month earlier, and factory production rose for the first time since September.
Shirakawa said last week that the bank expects the recession to “moderate gradually and the economy to start to level out towards the end of this year.” Economists anticipate the government’s 25 trillion yen ($264 billion) in stimulus measures will provide at least temporary relief.
Still, yesterday’s GDP report showed that even as exports and output begin to stabilize, the recession is spreading to households as companies fire staff and cut wages to stem losses.
While the bank is likely to raise its economic assessment, “policy makers will stay on alert against the risk that growth will fail and prices will keep falling,” said Yasunari Ueno, chief market economist at Mizuho Securities Co. in Tokyo.
Two consecutive quarters of record contractions in GDP have shrunk the economy to its 2003 size and pushed it closer to the deflation that it overcame less than four years ago.
‘Worst Is Out’
“The economy has slid so far that whatever you do now, it looks good,” said Martin Schulz, senior economist at Fujitsu Research Institute in Tokyo. “We’ve had two quarters of shrinking by 15 percent. Of course the worst is out.”
During Japan’s last tussle with deflation, consumers delayed purchases, eroding profits and forcing firms to cut wages. Shirakawa has said consumers this time around still anticipate inflation and a spiral of falling prices is unlikely.
Bank of Japan policy makers say they consider inflation to be stable at zero to 2 percent. That sets the bar too low, inviting price declines, said Richard Jerram, chief economist at Macquarie Securities Ltd. in Tokyo.
“There’s going to be deflation as far as the eye can see,” Jerram said. The central bank should aim for inflation of 2 percent and make a commitment to keep buying bonds to meet the target, effectively printing money in a “permanent debt monetization,” he said.
Read more here
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Japan logs record GDP drop
(Reuters) - Japan's economy shrank a record 4.0 percent in the first quarter as domestic demand and investment buckled, threatening to crush any export-led rebound later this year.
The data did add to growing evidence that global trade may have bottomed out in the first quarter. Net exports proved to be less of a drag on the world's second-largest economy than in the previous three months, and companies ran down inventory.
While that lent support to the growing chorus of forecasts that the global economy was pulling out of the dive triggered by the financial crisis, there were grim signals on the outlook for Japan, where GDP is shrinking twice as fast as in the United States.
The GDP contraction was slightly less the 4.2 percent median forecast in a Reuters poll, but private consumption and capital spending fared worse than analysts had expected.
Private consumption dropped 1.1 percent, compared with 0.8 percent in the previous quarter. The forecast was for a decline 0.9 percent. Capital spending shrank 10.4 percent versus 6.7 percent in the previous three months and an 8.1 percent forecast.
"Weaker-than-expected figures for capex and private consumption suggest the negative impact from the export plunge is spreading to domestic demand," said economist Hiroshi Shiraishi at BNP Paribas.
"As such, the Japanese economy may return to growth temporarily but it could suffer a contraction again afterwards."
Read more here
The data did add to growing evidence that global trade may have bottomed out in the first quarter. Net exports proved to be less of a drag on the world's second-largest economy than in the previous three months, and companies ran down inventory.
While that lent support to the growing chorus of forecasts that the global economy was pulling out of the dive triggered by the financial crisis, there were grim signals on the outlook for Japan, where GDP is shrinking twice as fast as in the United States.
The GDP contraction was slightly less the 4.2 percent median forecast in a Reuters poll, but private consumption and capital spending fared worse than analysts had expected.
Private consumption dropped 1.1 percent, compared with 0.8 percent in the previous quarter. The forecast was for a decline 0.9 percent. Capital spending shrank 10.4 percent versus 6.7 percent in the previous three months and an 8.1 percent forecast.
"Weaker-than-expected figures for capex and private consumption suggest the negative impact from the export plunge is spreading to domestic demand," said economist Hiroshi Shiraishi at BNP Paribas.
"As such, the Japanese economy may return to growth temporarily but it could suffer a contraction again afterwards."
Read more here
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Pension Gap Widening to $334 Billion Forces U.K. Dividend Cuts
(Bloomberg) -- The 220 billion pound ($334 billion) hole in U.K. corporate pensions may push companies to cut dividends, damping the recovery in Europe’s largest stock market.
The 1.17 percentage point drop in corporate bond yields since October is forcing companies from BT Group Plc to BAE Systems Plc to set aside more cash for future obligations. London-based BT slashed its dividend by 89 percent last week to support a plan for more than 340,000 current and retired employees.
More will follow, adding to the biggest dividend reductions in Europe since at least 1997, according to data compiled by Paris-based Societe Generale SA and UBS AG in Zurich. U.K. companies are the most susceptible because English corporations typically run pension funds, unlike the rest of Europe, where the state is responsible for retirees.
“Pension managers are caught in the perfect storm,” said Chetan Ghosh at Investment Solutions Ltd. in London, which oversees more than $13.8 billion. “Bond yields are falling and stocks have not recovered from last year’s sell-off. This will increasingly be a problem through 2011.”
Dividend reductions would add pressure to share prices already battered by the global recession and the region’s first annual net gain in equity sales since 2005.
‘Under-Funded’
BT, the U.K.’s largest phone company, and BAE Systems, Europe’s biggest arms maker, rank with British Airways Plc and Dusseldorf, Germany-based ThyssenKrupp AG, Germany’s largest steelmaker, as having a “high risk” of using cash to shore up pensions, Societe Generale said in a report last month.
BAE Systems plans to contribute an additional 200 million pounds to help cover its U.K. pension deficit and $250 million for its U.S. plan. London-based British Airways, Europe’s third- largest airline, may have to set aside more money for its growing pension deficit, analysts at Paris-based brokerage Oddo Securities wrote in a March 6 report.
“Markets underestimate the extra funding needs for companies’ pension obligations,” said Claudia Panseri, a strategist at Societe Generale in Paris. “Unless the equity markets rebound significantly during 2009, pension funds will remain significantly underfunded, which will result in high contribution requirements in 2010 and 2011.”
Discount Rate
International accounting rules require pension plans to calculate the amount of money they need today to meet future payments. The total is increased or reduced by an amount proportional to yields on corporate bonds, reflecting what a company will earn in interest before benefits are due. The lower the yield, the more money must be pledged now.
The deficits are in part an unintended consequence of the Bank of England’s efforts to pull the country out of the steepest economic contraction in at least three decades. The central bank cut its benchmark interest rate to a record 0.5 percent and said it would spend as much as 125 billion pounds to buy debt securities in an attempt to push down borrowing costs. The U.K. economy shrank at a 1.9 percent rate in the first quarter, the biggest contraction since Margaret Thatcher came to power in 1979.
Yields on 15-year corporate bonds in pounds rated AA have dropped to 6.55 percent from 7.72 percent in October, according to Markit Group Ltd. The decline may continue, according to Mark Bon, a London-based fund manager who helps oversee about $750 million at Canada Life Ltd.
Worst Case
“Yields are still falling and it will become increasingly difficult to fund pensions,” Bon said. “The worst-case scenario is depressed equity markets and deflation which keeps interest rates very, very low for a long time.”
A Bank of England spokesman said the central bank hasn’t commented on the effect of lower yields on benefit plans.
Deficits for companies in the FTSE 350 Index almost doubled to 61 billion pounds in the first three months of 2009, according to Mercer Ltd., a consulting firm. The “technical” funding needs as reported by pension trustees, a more accurate indication of shortfalls, climbed to 220 billion pounds at the end of March, said Matt Collinson, a Birmingham, England-based consultant at Mercer.
European equity benchmarks have recouped their 2009 losses since early March on speculation the worst financial crisis in seven decades is easing. Britain’s FTSE 100 Index is down 1.9 percent for the year after rallying 24 percent since March 3. The measure has retreated 35 percent from a seven-year high in June 2007.
Read more here
The 1.17 percentage point drop in corporate bond yields since October is forcing companies from BT Group Plc to BAE Systems Plc to set aside more cash for future obligations. London-based BT slashed its dividend by 89 percent last week to support a plan for more than 340,000 current and retired employees.
More will follow, adding to the biggest dividend reductions in Europe since at least 1997, according to data compiled by Paris-based Societe Generale SA and UBS AG in Zurich. U.K. companies are the most susceptible because English corporations typically run pension funds, unlike the rest of Europe, where the state is responsible for retirees.
“Pension managers are caught in the perfect storm,” said Chetan Ghosh at Investment Solutions Ltd. in London, which oversees more than $13.8 billion. “Bond yields are falling and stocks have not recovered from last year’s sell-off. This will increasingly be a problem through 2011.”
Dividend reductions would add pressure to share prices already battered by the global recession and the region’s first annual net gain in equity sales since 2005.
‘Under-Funded’
BT, the U.K.’s largest phone company, and BAE Systems, Europe’s biggest arms maker, rank with British Airways Plc and Dusseldorf, Germany-based ThyssenKrupp AG, Germany’s largest steelmaker, as having a “high risk” of using cash to shore up pensions, Societe Generale said in a report last month.
BAE Systems plans to contribute an additional 200 million pounds to help cover its U.K. pension deficit and $250 million for its U.S. plan. London-based British Airways, Europe’s third- largest airline, may have to set aside more money for its growing pension deficit, analysts at Paris-based brokerage Oddo Securities wrote in a March 6 report.
“Markets underestimate the extra funding needs for companies’ pension obligations,” said Claudia Panseri, a strategist at Societe Generale in Paris. “Unless the equity markets rebound significantly during 2009, pension funds will remain significantly underfunded, which will result in high contribution requirements in 2010 and 2011.”
Discount Rate
International accounting rules require pension plans to calculate the amount of money they need today to meet future payments. The total is increased or reduced by an amount proportional to yields on corporate bonds, reflecting what a company will earn in interest before benefits are due. The lower the yield, the more money must be pledged now.
The deficits are in part an unintended consequence of the Bank of England’s efforts to pull the country out of the steepest economic contraction in at least three decades. The central bank cut its benchmark interest rate to a record 0.5 percent and said it would spend as much as 125 billion pounds to buy debt securities in an attempt to push down borrowing costs. The U.K. economy shrank at a 1.9 percent rate in the first quarter, the biggest contraction since Margaret Thatcher came to power in 1979.
Yields on 15-year corporate bonds in pounds rated AA have dropped to 6.55 percent from 7.72 percent in October, according to Markit Group Ltd. The decline may continue, according to Mark Bon, a London-based fund manager who helps oversee about $750 million at Canada Life Ltd.
Worst Case
“Yields are still falling and it will become increasingly difficult to fund pensions,” Bon said. “The worst-case scenario is depressed equity markets and deflation which keeps interest rates very, very low for a long time.”
A Bank of England spokesman said the central bank hasn’t commented on the effect of lower yields on benefit plans.
Deficits for companies in the FTSE 350 Index almost doubled to 61 billion pounds in the first three months of 2009, according to Mercer Ltd., a consulting firm. The “technical” funding needs as reported by pension trustees, a more accurate indication of shortfalls, climbed to 220 billion pounds at the end of March, said Matt Collinson, a Birmingham, England-based consultant at Mercer.
European equity benchmarks have recouped their 2009 losses since early March on speculation the worst financial crisis in seven decades is easing. Britain’s FTSE 100 Index is down 1.9 percent for the year after rallying 24 percent since March 3. The measure has retreated 35 percent from a seven-year high in June 2007.
Read more here
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Treasury says insurers to get TARP funds access
(Reuters) - The U.S. Treasury Department said on Thursday that four insurers had been approved for access to the government's bank bailout plan.
A Treasury spokesman said Hartford Financial, Prudential Financial Group, Lincoln National Corp and Prudential Financial Inc met requirements for access to the government's Capital Purchase Program.
Read more here
A Treasury spokesman said Hartford Financial, Prudential Financial Group, Lincoln National Corp and Prudential Financial Inc met requirements for access to the government's Capital Purchase Program.
Read more here
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Ford walks tightrope amid industry downturn
(Reuters) - Ford Motor Co executives face stockholders on Thursday to detail the automaker's plans to complete a turnaround without resorting to U.S. government help and steer clear of the industry collapse now swallowing rivals General Motors Corp and Chrysler.
After a wild ride over the past year, Ford investors have seen the automaker's stock increase three-fold since mid-February as the company pressed ahead of its cross-town rivals with agreements to restructure its debt and cut its obligations to the United Auto Workers union.
Ford, the only U.S. carmaker not operating on emergency U.S. government loans, mortgaged itself to the hilt in late 2006 to amass cash for a turnaround that remains on track as Chrysler was forced into bankruptcy on April 30. GM could join Chrysler in Chapter 11 within weeks.
When Ford's top executives open the automaker's annual meeting in Wilmington, Delaware, they will be able to tell shareholders they have completed a debt restructuring and new union agreements.
"They got in early and they had the money and they didn't have to get the government involved and that gave them more time," Standard & Poor's equity analyst Efraim Levy said.
"Their retail share has stabilized, but they are not out of the woods yet," he said. "There is still risk for Ford."
Ford posted a company record net loss of $14.7 billion in 2008 and losses totaled $30 billion over the last three full years. It posted a first-quarter net loss of $1.43 billion.
Still, analysts see the Ford debt restructuring, the union agreements and the automaker's ability to issue more stock as signs that it could make it through the industry downturn and out the other side without seeking government emergency loans.
The automaker's stock closed at $4.96 Wednesday on the New York Stock Exchange, down about 40 percent from a year earlier.
Chief Executive Alan Mulally told reporters last week Ford's restructuring was on track and it had sufficient liquidity to complete its restructuring plan.
The automaker has said that it expects to be breakeven or profitable in 2011 under its restructuring forecast.
One of the agreements between Ford and the United Auto Workers reworked the funding of a trust for union retiree healthcare, a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association. Ford may now provide half of its obligation in stock instead of cash to preserve liquidity.
The VEBA funding plan requires shareholder approval at the annual meeting. Ford's deal with the UAW also provided contract changes to cut labor costs.
The annual meeting agenda has several shareholder rights initiatives, including an advisory vote on eliminating a preferred voting structure that has given the Ford family control of the company since it went public in 1956.
Under that structure, Ford family members hold a 40 percent voting interest through 70.9 million Class B shares, while the automaker had more than 2.3 billion common shares outstanding as of March 18, according to its proxy statement.
Read more here
After a wild ride over the past year, Ford investors have seen the automaker's stock increase three-fold since mid-February as the company pressed ahead of its cross-town rivals with agreements to restructure its debt and cut its obligations to the United Auto Workers union.
Ford, the only U.S. carmaker not operating on emergency U.S. government loans, mortgaged itself to the hilt in late 2006 to amass cash for a turnaround that remains on track as Chrysler was forced into bankruptcy on April 30. GM could join Chrysler in Chapter 11 within weeks.
When Ford's top executives open the automaker's annual meeting in Wilmington, Delaware, they will be able to tell shareholders they have completed a debt restructuring and new union agreements.
"They got in early and they had the money and they didn't have to get the government involved and that gave them more time," Standard & Poor's equity analyst Efraim Levy said.
"Their retail share has stabilized, but they are not out of the woods yet," he said. "There is still risk for Ford."
Ford posted a company record net loss of $14.7 billion in 2008 and losses totaled $30 billion over the last three full years. It posted a first-quarter net loss of $1.43 billion.
Still, analysts see the Ford debt restructuring, the union agreements and the automaker's ability to issue more stock as signs that it could make it through the industry downturn and out the other side without seeking government emergency loans.
The automaker's stock closed at $4.96 Wednesday on the New York Stock Exchange, down about 40 percent from a year earlier.
Chief Executive Alan Mulally told reporters last week Ford's restructuring was on track and it had sufficient liquidity to complete its restructuring plan.
The automaker has said that it expects to be breakeven or profitable in 2011 under its restructuring forecast.
One of the agreements between Ford and the United Auto Workers reworked the funding of a trust for union retiree healthcare, a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association. Ford may now provide half of its obligation in stock instead of cash to preserve liquidity.
The VEBA funding plan requires shareholder approval at the annual meeting. Ford's deal with the UAW also provided contract changes to cut labor costs.
The annual meeting agenda has several shareholder rights initiatives, including an advisory vote on eliminating a preferred voting structure that has given the Ford family control of the company since it went public in 1956.
Under that structure, Ford family members hold a 40 percent voting interest through 70.9 million Class B shares, while the automaker had more than 2.3 billion common shares outstanding as of March 18, according to its proxy statement.
Read more here
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
AIG Trustees Should Answer to Taxpayers, Not Fed, Towns Says
(Bloomberg) -- A House panel plans to ask trustees assigned to safeguard the U.S. government’s $182.5 billion investment in American International Group Inc. whether their supervision by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York serves taxpayers’ interests.
The trustees -- Jill Considine, Chester Feldberg and Douglas Foshee -- were appointed in January by the New York Fed, a private institution owned by member banks, which has the power to overturn some of their decisions and to remove them. Edolphus Towns, a New York Democrat who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Reform that will hold hearings tomorrow, said he’s concerned that the interests of AIG’s customers and trading partners may outweigh those of taxpayers.
“As a $182.5 billion recipient of taxpayer dollars, AIG should no longer be able to operate in the dark,” said Towns in an e-mail. “The American people, who now own a major portion of this company, deserve clarification on core issues of the AIG bailout -- who exactly is in charge at AIG and who is protecting the taxpayer’s multibillion-dollar investment?”
AIG is the biggest recipient of government rescue funds. Whether it can repay the money may depend on actions by the trustees, some of which must be approved by the New York Fed. The New York-based insurer has received four bailouts valued at $182.5 billion since agreeing in September to turn over about an 80 percent stake in the company to the government.
AIG Counterparties
Peter Bakstansky, a spokesman for the trustees and a former spokesman for the New York Fed, said the three are “prepared to talk about” what they have been doing since their appointment when they testify. He said the trustees speak weekly with AIG management by telephone and meet monthly in person. He declined to give further details.
Deborah Kilroe, a spokeswoman for the New York Fed, declined to comment.
The insurer’s counterparties include firms connected to the New York Fed, such as Goldman Sachs Group Inc., which has received more than $8 billion of AIG’s bailout funds to settle credit-default swaps it had with the firm. Towns’s committee plans to ask the trustees and AIG Chief Executive Officer Edward Liddy, who is also scheduled to testify, why the company didn’t try to negotiate for payments of less than the full amount.
New York Fed President William Dudley worked until 2007 as Goldman Sachs’s chief economist. Stephen Friedman, who resigned as New York Fed chairman May 7, was once CEO of Goldman Sachs and supervised the search for Dudley.
Friedman resigned from his New York Fed post after the Wall Street Journal reported that he bought 37,300 shares of Goldman Sachs last year while seeking a waiver of Fed policy that would have precluded him from sitting on the Goldman Sachs board and being New York Fed chairman at the same time. The shares have since gained $3 million in value.
‘Widening Morass’
“These programs are drawing the Federal Reserve into a widening political morass and compromising Fed independence,” said William Poole, former president of the St. Louis Fed. The Fed lending programs “ought to have legislative authorization and ought to be run out of the Treasury or some other agency of the federal government.”
Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein rejected calls to remove Friedman. “He is a credit to our board,” Blankfein said last week at the firm’s annual meeting in New York. Friedman said he bought the shares “because I thought Goldman Sachs stock, under tangible net worth, was at a very attractive price.”
The New York Fed is one of 12 regional Federal Reserve banks and the one charged with monitoring capital markets. It is also managing $1.7 trillion of emergency lending programs. While the Fed’s Washington-based Board of Governors is a federal agency subject to the Freedom of Information Act and other government rules, the New York Fed and other regional banks maintain they are separate institutions, owned by their member banks, and not subject to federal restrictions.
Read more here
The trustees -- Jill Considine, Chester Feldberg and Douglas Foshee -- were appointed in January by the New York Fed, a private institution owned by member banks, which has the power to overturn some of their decisions and to remove them. Edolphus Towns, a New York Democrat who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Reform that will hold hearings tomorrow, said he’s concerned that the interests of AIG’s customers and trading partners may outweigh those of taxpayers.
“As a $182.5 billion recipient of taxpayer dollars, AIG should no longer be able to operate in the dark,” said Towns in an e-mail. “The American people, who now own a major portion of this company, deserve clarification on core issues of the AIG bailout -- who exactly is in charge at AIG and who is protecting the taxpayer’s multibillion-dollar investment?”
AIG is the biggest recipient of government rescue funds. Whether it can repay the money may depend on actions by the trustees, some of which must be approved by the New York Fed. The New York-based insurer has received four bailouts valued at $182.5 billion since agreeing in September to turn over about an 80 percent stake in the company to the government.
AIG Counterparties
Peter Bakstansky, a spokesman for the trustees and a former spokesman for the New York Fed, said the three are “prepared to talk about” what they have been doing since their appointment when they testify. He said the trustees speak weekly with AIG management by telephone and meet monthly in person. He declined to give further details.
Deborah Kilroe, a spokeswoman for the New York Fed, declined to comment.
The insurer’s counterparties include firms connected to the New York Fed, such as Goldman Sachs Group Inc., which has received more than $8 billion of AIG’s bailout funds to settle credit-default swaps it had with the firm. Towns’s committee plans to ask the trustees and AIG Chief Executive Officer Edward Liddy, who is also scheduled to testify, why the company didn’t try to negotiate for payments of less than the full amount.
New York Fed President William Dudley worked until 2007 as Goldman Sachs’s chief economist. Stephen Friedman, who resigned as New York Fed chairman May 7, was once CEO of Goldman Sachs and supervised the search for Dudley.
Friedman resigned from his New York Fed post after the Wall Street Journal reported that he bought 37,300 shares of Goldman Sachs last year while seeking a waiver of Fed policy that would have precluded him from sitting on the Goldman Sachs board and being New York Fed chairman at the same time. The shares have since gained $3 million in value.
‘Widening Morass’
“These programs are drawing the Federal Reserve into a widening political morass and compromising Fed independence,” said William Poole, former president of the St. Louis Fed. The Fed lending programs “ought to have legislative authorization and ought to be run out of the Treasury or some other agency of the federal government.”
Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein rejected calls to remove Friedman. “He is a credit to our board,” Blankfein said last week at the firm’s annual meeting in New York. Friedman said he bought the shares “because I thought Goldman Sachs stock, under tangible net worth, was at a very attractive price.”
The New York Fed is one of 12 regional Federal Reserve banks and the one charged with monitoring capital markets. It is also managing $1.7 trillion of emergency lending programs. While the Fed’s Washington-based Board of Governors is a federal agency subject to the Freedom of Information Act and other government rules, the New York Fed and other regional banks maintain they are separate institutions, owned by their member banks, and not subject to federal restrictions.
Read more here
Monday, May 11, 2009
Rich May Be Australian Budget Target Amid Recession
(Bloomberg) -- Australian Treasurer Wayne Swan will tonight unveil a Robin Hood-style budget, slashing tax breaks and welfare-payments to high-income earners as he tries to contain a record deficit amid the global recession.
Swan will take away subsidies for the rich while protecting payments to lower-income earners, the aged and the unemployed in the budget, framed amid an economic slump that has cut tax revenue by more than A$200 billion ($153 billion), economists say. He releases the budget at 7:30 p.m. in Canberra.
The Labor government of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd will unveil a A$34 billion deficit in the year ending June 30, the first shortfall in seven years, as tax revenue from a commodities export boom dries up, according to the median of 16 economists surveyed by Bloomberg. Swan warned today there “will be tough decisions,” as he tries to limit debt in a budget the treasury department says won’t return to surplus until 2015-16.
“Swan will rob rich Peter to pay poor Paul,” said Stephen Walters, chief economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in Sydney. “The rivers of gold from the commodities boom flowing through the economy are well and truly over.”
The economists’ survey predicts Swan will also forecast budget deficits of A$58.5 billion in 2009-10 and A$60 billion in 2010-11. The economy will contract 0.3 percent in 2009-10, they forecast.
Treasury has said the government will have to borrow as much as A$200 billion through the bond market to fund deficits until 2015-16.
Tax Breaks
Swan has already signaled he will halve tax breaks for high-income earners contributing to pension funds and slash their government subsidy for private health insurance. At the same time, he’ll deliver extra help for families earning less than A$150,000 a year and increase payments to aged pensioners.
Still, income-tax cuts for people earning between A$80,000 and A$180,000 scheduled for the two years starting July 1 will go ahead. The cuts were part of A$23 billion in cuts announced in last year’s budget.
“Everybody in Australia has to do their bit and some people have the capacity to do a bit more,” Swan told reporters in Canberra today.
Swan’s imposts on high-income earners mirrors steps in the U.S. and the U.K.
Read more here
Swan will take away subsidies for the rich while protecting payments to lower-income earners, the aged and the unemployed in the budget, framed amid an economic slump that has cut tax revenue by more than A$200 billion ($153 billion), economists say. He releases the budget at 7:30 p.m. in Canberra.
The Labor government of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd will unveil a A$34 billion deficit in the year ending June 30, the first shortfall in seven years, as tax revenue from a commodities export boom dries up, according to the median of 16 economists surveyed by Bloomberg. Swan warned today there “will be tough decisions,” as he tries to limit debt in a budget the treasury department says won’t return to surplus until 2015-16.
“Swan will rob rich Peter to pay poor Paul,” said Stephen Walters, chief economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in Sydney. “The rivers of gold from the commodities boom flowing through the economy are well and truly over.”
The economists’ survey predicts Swan will also forecast budget deficits of A$58.5 billion in 2009-10 and A$60 billion in 2010-11. The economy will contract 0.3 percent in 2009-10, they forecast.
Treasury has said the government will have to borrow as much as A$200 billion through the bond market to fund deficits until 2015-16.
Tax Breaks
Swan has already signaled he will halve tax breaks for high-income earners contributing to pension funds and slash their government subsidy for private health insurance. At the same time, he’ll deliver extra help for families earning less than A$150,000 a year and increase payments to aged pensioners.
Still, income-tax cuts for people earning between A$80,000 and A$180,000 scheduled for the two years starting July 1 will go ahead. The cuts were part of A$23 billion in cuts announced in last year’s budget.
“Everybody in Australia has to do their bit and some people have the capacity to do a bit more,” Swan told reporters in Canberra today.
Swan’s imposts on high-income earners mirrors steps in the U.S. and the U.K.
Read more here
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Marchionne Picks Over U.S. Wreckage to Build European Car Group
(Bloomberg) -- Fiat SpA Chief Executive Officer Sergio Marchionne is setting out to build a pan-European car company from the rubble of the U.S. auto industry.
The car industry is in turmoil, and Marchionne, the 56-year-old deputy chairman of UBS AG, says he sees opportunity. He’s taking over Chrysler LLC after a U.S.-arranged bankruptcy and seeking to incorporate units owned by General Motors Corp., including three European brands, Opel, Vauxhall and Saab, and some Latin American operations.
“The sector produces 90 million vehicles against a demand of 60 million,” Marchionne said in an interview yesterday. “This overcapacity has to be managed and the American approach proved to be very efficient,” he said, referring to the U.S. administration’s readiness to lend $23.9 billion to Chrysler and GM on the condition that they cut costs.
Blending automakers to gain scale and geographic scope has been tried before. Chrysler and Daimler AG split up after a decade together. Carlos Ghosn “has had a hard time running Renault and Nissan,” as CEO of the allied automakers, said Tom Stallkamp, a former Chrysler president who is now a managing partner at Ripplewood Holdings LLC.
“Chrysler is going to be a full-time job in itself,” said Stallkamp, who warned that financing such a sprawling company will be difficult. “On paper, this probably makes sense, numbers wise, but it’s a cultural and logistical nightmare to make it all work.”
New CEO
For Marchionne and Turin, Italy-based Fiat, it’s a chance to save Chrysler, rescue Saab and pick up Opel to assemble a 6.8-million vehicle per year auto company.
“Chrysler is on track to re-emerge from bankruptcy in 60 days,” he said. “I will become Chrysler CEO after that.” The idea has been discussed in meetings with the Treasury, he said.
Saab is another matter. The Swedish carmaker sought protection from creditors Feb. 20 after General Motors Corp. said it would sever ties with the unit by 2010 as part of its own reorganization.
“Saab is an interesting opportunity, the brand is, however, too small for the auto mass market,” Marchionne said. “We could combine Saab with another brand. In the U.S., there’s a Saab dealership network. It would be a pity to give that up.”
He has said that a global auto group needs 5.5 million to 6 million vehicles annually to have the economies of scale to compete.
Read more here
The car industry is in turmoil, and Marchionne, the 56-year-old deputy chairman of UBS AG, says he sees opportunity. He’s taking over Chrysler LLC after a U.S.-arranged bankruptcy and seeking to incorporate units owned by General Motors Corp., including three European brands, Opel, Vauxhall and Saab, and some Latin American operations.
“The sector produces 90 million vehicles against a demand of 60 million,” Marchionne said in an interview yesterday. “This overcapacity has to be managed and the American approach proved to be very efficient,” he said, referring to the U.S. administration’s readiness to lend $23.9 billion to Chrysler and GM on the condition that they cut costs.
Blending automakers to gain scale and geographic scope has been tried before. Chrysler and Daimler AG split up after a decade together. Carlos Ghosn “has had a hard time running Renault and Nissan,” as CEO of the allied automakers, said Tom Stallkamp, a former Chrysler president who is now a managing partner at Ripplewood Holdings LLC.
“Chrysler is going to be a full-time job in itself,” said Stallkamp, who warned that financing such a sprawling company will be difficult. “On paper, this probably makes sense, numbers wise, but it’s a cultural and logistical nightmare to make it all work.”
New CEO
For Marchionne and Turin, Italy-based Fiat, it’s a chance to save Chrysler, rescue Saab and pick up Opel to assemble a 6.8-million vehicle per year auto company.
“Chrysler is on track to re-emerge from bankruptcy in 60 days,” he said. “I will become Chrysler CEO after that.” The idea has been discussed in meetings with the Treasury, he said.
Saab is another matter. The Swedish carmaker sought protection from creditors Feb. 20 after General Motors Corp. said it would sever ties with the unit by 2010 as part of its own reorganization.
“Saab is an interesting opportunity, the brand is, however, too small for the auto mass market,” Marchionne said. “We could combine Saab with another brand. In the U.S., there’s a Saab dealership network. It would be a pity to give that up.”
He has said that a global auto group needs 5.5 million to 6 million vehicles annually to have the economies of scale to compete.
Read more here
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Putnam’s CEO to Propose Expansion of 401(k) Retirement Plans
(Bloomberg) -- Putnam Investments Chief Executive Officer Robert Reynolds plans to urge regulators and investment professionals today to expand workplace retirement plans and make them safer.
Reynolds, in the text of a speech set to be delivered in Washington, proposes mandatory 401(k) enrollment for workers whose employers offer the plan and bigger tax breaks for companies that match contributions. He will speak at an event organized by 401kWire.com, a retirement industry Web site.
The average retirement-account balance sank 30 percent to $58,000 in the two years ended Dec. 31, according to Hewitt Associates Inc., a Lincolnshire, Illinois-based benefits- consulting firm. Investors had $2.7 trillion in 401(k) accounts as of Sept. 30, according to the Washington-based Investment Company Institute, a trade group representing mutual funds.
“The multitrillion-dollar wave of wealth destruction that struck America’s markets in 2008 inflicted serious losses for retirement savings,” Reynolds said. “We need to act now to reboot the system and boost retirement savings.”
In February, Representative George Miller, a California Democrat and chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, called 401(k)s “little more than a high-stakes crapshoot.”
A law passed in 2006 allowed 401(k) providers to automatically enroll new workers, forcing them to opt out if they desired. For the 30 percent of plans that switched from voluntary enrollment, participation rose to about 90 percent of employees from 60 percent, according to Boston-based Putnam.
Read more here
Reynolds, in the text of a speech set to be delivered in Washington, proposes mandatory 401(k) enrollment for workers whose employers offer the plan and bigger tax breaks for companies that match contributions. He will speak at an event organized by 401kWire.com, a retirement industry Web site.
The average retirement-account balance sank 30 percent to $58,000 in the two years ended Dec. 31, according to Hewitt Associates Inc., a Lincolnshire, Illinois-based benefits- consulting firm. Investors had $2.7 trillion in 401(k) accounts as of Sept. 30, according to the Washington-based Investment Company Institute, a trade group representing mutual funds.
“The multitrillion-dollar wave of wealth destruction that struck America’s markets in 2008 inflicted serious losses for retirement savings,” Reynolds said. “We need to act now to reboot the system and boost retirement savings.”
In February, Representative George Miller, a California Democrat and chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, called 401(k)s “little more than a high-stakes crapshoot.”
A law passed in 2006 allowed 401(k) providers to automatically enroll new workers, forcing them to opt out if they desired. For the 30 percent of plans that switched from voluntary enrollment, participation rose to about 90 percent of employees from 60 percent, according to Boston-based Putnam.
Read more here
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Wall Street Firms Will Revert to Pre-Crisis Model, Cohen Says
(Bloomberg) -- Wall Street, after getting billions of taxpayer dollars, will emerge from the financial crisis looking much the same as before markets collapsed, said H. Rodgin Cohen, chairman of law firm Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.
“The system will look more like what preceded the current environment than many people seem to believe,” Cohen said yesterday at a panel discussion on the future of Wall Street sponsored by Bloomberg News in New York. “I am far from convinced there was something inherently wrong with the system.”
Cohen, 64, joined Lazard Ltd. Deputy Chairman Gary Parr, 52, and Carlyle Group co-founder David Rubenstein, 59, in discussing the industry’s future after the deepest financial crisis since the Great Depression forced the government to take equity stakes in hundreds of financial institutions. The panelists projected a future led by core banking and lower risk for established firms.
“There’s a good chance there are five to seven or eight global institutions, of which three or four will be clear winners and then some others will be good, doing full-service banking and securities business sort of as we knew it five years ago,” Parr said. They will operate “with a lot lower return on equity and a lot lower risk profile,” he added.
Banks and other financial institutions reported more than $1.37 trillion in writedowns and losses since the mortgage markets collapsed in 2007, and Parr said more are ahead. “There is still hundreds of billions of dollars of losses to be realized at a number of financial institutions,” he said. “There will be a need for substantial capital raising.”
Wall Street ‘Reshaped’
Rubenstein said that while Wall Street will likely rebound after the recession, competition probably will emerge from global banks being formed in China and the Middle East as well as from so-called boutique investment banks at home.
“Wall Street will be reshaped,” Rubenstein said. “People once thought that American brand-name institutions could do no wrong and that if they sold a product, it was a good product, and if they said something was worth a certain value, it was worth a certain value. Now that has changed.”
U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has urged broad changes in regulating the U.S. financial system to address a lack of confidence caused by the credit crisis.
President Barack Obama in the New York Times Magazine May 3 called for “an updating of the regulatory regimes comparable to what we did in the 1930s, when there were rules that were put in place that gave investors a little more assurance that they knew what they were buying.” Obama stopped short of calling for a restoration of the Depression-era separation between banks and brokerages created by the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, which was repealed in 1999.
Glass-Steagall
“Some people say, did all of this arise due to the elimination of Glass-Steagall and we should put Glass-Steagall back into place,” Parr, a specialist in advising financial firms, said at the panel. “I’ve observed that that had little or nothing to do with this crisis.”
Rubenstein said private-equity firms will take advantage of the financial crisis by investing in “smaller” financial companies.
“This is a good opportunity for private equity to show what it can do,” Rubenstein said.
Carlyle is preparing a bid for BankUnited Financial Corp., a Florida lender deemed “critically undercapitalized” by federal regulators, with Blackstone Group LP and billionaire Wilbur Ross, people familiar with the offer said April 22.
“Whenever there is disequilibrium or imbalance in a system, there is always opportunity,” Rubenstein said, declining to comment on BankUnited. “Opportunities will be in smaller banks where you can do the due diligence and where you can have some involvement in management and you can effectuate some changes in the way the company is run.”
Read more here
“The system will look more like what preceded the current environment than many people seem to believe,” Cohen said yesterday at a panel discussion on the future of Wall Street sponsored by Bloomberg News in New York. “I am far from convinced there was something inherently wrong with the system.”
Cohen, 64, joined Lazard Ltd. Deputy Chairman Gary Parr, 52, and Carlyle Group co-founder David Rubenstein, 59, in discussing the industry’s future after the deepest financial crisis since the Great Depression forced the government to take equity stakes in hundreds of financial institutions. The panelists projected a future led by core banking and lower risk for established firms.
“There’s a good chance there are five to seven or eight global institutions, of which three or four will be clear winners and then some others will be good, doing full-service banking and securities business sort of as we knew it five years ago,” Parr said. They will operate “with a lot lower return on equity and a lot lower risk profile,” he added.
Banks and other financial institutions reported more than $1.37 trillion in writedowns and losses since the mortgage markets collapsed in 2007, and Parr said more are ahead. “There is still hundreds of billions of dollars of losses to be realized at a number of financial institutions,” he said. “There will be a need for substantial capital raising.”
Wall Street ‘Reshaped’
Rubenstein said that while Wall Street will likely rebound after the recession, competition probably will emerge from global banks being formed in China and the Middle East as well as from so-called boutique investment banks at home.
“Wall Street will be reshaped,” Rubenstein said. “People once thought that American brand-name institutions could do no wrong and that if they sold a product, it was a good product, and if they said something was worth a certain value, it was worth a certain value. Now that has changed.”
U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has urged broad changes in regulating the U.S. financial system to address a lack of confidence caused by the credit crisis.
President Barack Obama in the New York Times Magazine May 3 called for “an updating of the regulatory regimes comparable to what we did in the 1930s, when there were rules that were put in place that gave investors a little more assurance that they knew what they were buying.” Obama stopped short of calling for a restoration of the Depression-era separation between banks and brokerages created by the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, which was repealed in 1999.
Glass-Steagall
“Some people say, did all of this arise due to the elimination of Glass-Steagall and we should put Glass-Steagall back into place,” Parr, a specialist in advising financial firms, said at the panel. “I’ve observed that that had little or nothing to do with this crisis.”
Rubenstein said private-equity firms will take advantage of the financial crisis by investing in “smaller” financial companies.
“This is a good opportunity for private equity to show what it can do,” Rubenstein said.
Carlyle is preparing a bid for BankUnited Financial Corp., a Florida lender deemed “critically undercapitalized” by federal regulators, with Blackstone Group LP and billionaire Wilbur Ross, people familiar with the offer said April 22.
“Whenever there is disequilibrium or imbalance in a system, there is always opportunity,” Rubenstein said, declining to comment on BankUnited. “Opportunities will be in smaller banks where you can do the due diligence and where you can have some involvement in management and you can effectuate some changes in the way the company is run.”
Read more here
Monday, May 4, 2009
New Chrysler auto incentives coming
(CNNMoney.com) -- With bankruptcy threatening to further weigh down the carmaker's sales, Chrysler is expected to announce a new incentive program Tuesday.
Chrysler's "Employee Pricing Plus Plus," program ended just days after the carmaker declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy. That program combined cash rebates with price reductions and cut-rate financing for qualified customers.
The new sales program is expected to rely heavily on giving dealers cash incentives, which means that customers will see big price reductions at the dealership, said Jessica Caldwell, an industry analyst with the automotive Website Edmunds.com.
Dealer incentives give auto dealers extra cash that can, in turn, be used to offset price reductions negotiated with customers. Dealer cash incentives are more subtle than straight cash rebates, so they aren't as damaging to a car brand's image and they don't reduce resale value of cars the way more straightforward customer rebates do.
But incentive money for dealers will likely be paired with limited customer rebates as well, Caldwell said. The carmaker announced in a conference call on Friday that the incentive plan would include some "loyalty" incentives for returning Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep buyers.
Chrysler has been the biggest spender among all auto manufacturers on incentives in the U.S. market. Last month, Chrysler spent $4,288 per vehicle on incentives.
Read more here
Chrysler's "Employee Pricing Plus Plus," program ended just days after the carmaker declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy. That program combined cash rebates with price reductions and cut-rate financing for qualified customers.
The new sales program is expected to rely heavily on giving dealers cash incentives, which means that customers will see big price reductions at the dealership, said Jessica Caldwell, an industry analyst with the automotive Website Edmunds.com.
Dealer incentives give auto dealers extra cash that can, in turn, be used to offset price reductions negotiated with customers. Dealer cash incentives are more subtle than straight cash rebates, so they aren't as damaging to a car brand's image and they don't reduce resale value of cars the way more straightforward customer rebates do.
But incentive money for dealers will likely be paired with limited customer rebates as well, Caldwell said. The carmaker announced in a conference call on Friday that the incentive plan would include some "loyalty" incentives for returning Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep buyers.
Chrysler has been the biggest spender among all auto manufacturers on incentives in the U.S. market. Last month, Chrysler spent $4,288 per vehicle on incentives.
Read more here
Sunday, May 3, 2009
Catch-Up Buying May Lift S&P 500 as High as 1,000
(Bloomberg) -- “Most investors have missed the rally” in U.S. stocks, so further gains are likely as they spend some of their cash to buy shares, according to Andrew Garthwaite, a global strategist at Credit Suisse Group.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index may reach 1,000 before prices peak, he wrote in a report yesterday. His estimate is 15 percent higher than yesterday’s close of 872.81, which resulted from the S&P 500’s biggest monthly gain since March 2000. The index last closed above 1,000 on Nov. 4.
As the CHART OF THE DAY shows, investors have more money stashed away in money-market mutual funds than in equity funds, according to data compiled by the Investment Company Institute. That hadn’t been the case for 16 years, according to the report, which included a chart comparing the funds’ assets since 1991.
Read more here
The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index may reach 1,000 before prices peak, he wrote in a report yesterday. His estimate is 15 percent higher than yesterday’s close of 872.81, which resulted from the S&P 500’s biggest monthly gain since March 2000. The index last closed above 1,000 on Nov. 4.
As the CHART OF THE DAY shows, investors have more money stashed away in money-market mutual funds than in equity funds, according to data compiled by the Investment Company Institute. That hadn’t been the case for 16 years, according to the report, which included a chart comparing the funds’ assets since 1991.
Read more here
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Specter's shift will help him more than Democrats
(MarketWatch) -- With longtime Republican Sen. Arlen Specter switching to the Democratic Party, all of Washington is abuzz with news that the Democrats will have a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.
President Barack Obama's agenda might get a small boost from Specter's change, but the biggest beneficiary is likely to be Specter, who changed parties to protect himself, not Obama. See full story.
With 60 sure votes, the Democrats would be able to advance much of Obama's agenda, especially the transformations in the health-care and energy sectors. Under Senate rules, a minority of 41 senators can block almost any legislation or nomination.
The problem is that the 60 votes aren't sure. There is no guarantee that all 60 will consistently vote to end filibusters mounted by the Republicans. Every issue, every bill is different. The Democratic leaders still have to get the votes of a few moderates of either party, including Pennsylvania's Specter, Democrat Ben Nelson of Nebraska, or Maine Republicans Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe.
Specter said he would not be an automatic 60th vote.
The current lineup in the Senate is 56 Democrats, 41 Republicans and two independents who vote with the Democrats. Democrat Al Franken leads in the Minnesota race, now locked in the courts following a recount.
Read more here
President Barack Obama's agenda might get a small boost from Specter's change, but the biggest beneficiary is likely to be Specter, who changed parties to protect himself, not Obama. See full story.
With 60 sure votes, the Democrats would be able to advance much of Obama's agenda, especially the transformations in the health-care and energy sectors. Under Senate rules, a minority of 41 senators can block almost any legislation or nomination.
The problem is that the 60 votes aren't sure. There is no guarantee that all 60 will consistently vote to end filibusters mounted by the Republicans. Every issue, every bill is different. The Democratic leaders still have to get the votes of a few moderates of either party, including Pennsylvania's Specter, Democrat Ben Nelson of Nebraska, or Maine Republicans Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe.
Specter said he would not be an automatic 60th vote.
The current lineup in the Senate is 56 Democrats, 41 Republicans and two independents who vote with the Democrats. Democrat Al Franken leads in the Minnesota race, now locked in the courts following a recount.
Read more here
Monday, April 27, 2009
London Bankers Look for Exits After ‘Last Straw’ Tax Increase
(Bloomberg) -- Demetris Efstathiou, a hedge-fund trader and a Londoner for two decades, listened last week to Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling outline a plan to raise taxes on high earners. Then he decided to leave Britain.
“There is no reason for me to stay here anymore,” said Efstathiou, a 38-year-old Cypriot who moved to London in 1990. “This tax increase is the last straw. This government is no longer interested in the City.”
Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s proposal to boost the tax rate to 50 percent from 40 percent on income above 150,000 pounds ($220,000) pushed headlines about “class warfare” onto the front pages of the capital’s newspapers. It also prompted predictions from business groups that it would undermine the U.K.’s competitiveness and lead to an exodus of financial talent. Brown was portrayed as Vladimir Lenin in a cartoon on Page One of the Daily Telegraph.
The income-tax change, set to take effect next year, would give the U.K. a higher top rate than Spain, Italy, Germany, France and the U.S., according to KPMG, the accounting firm. Among the 30 members of the Organization for Economic Co- operation and Development, the country would jump to seventh from 19th in the rankings of tax rates, accounting firm Ernst & Young said.
The initiative is part of the government’s efforts to contain a planned budget deficit of 12.4 percent of gross domestic product, Britain’s biggest in peacetime. The Treasury expects the tax to raise about 2.2 billion pounds next year when government borrowing will be 173 billion pounds. Darling’s budget calls for 703 billion pounds of deficits in the five years through April 2014.
How Increase Works
Under the new rates, a banker making 350,000 pounds would pay 160,000 pounds in income-tax and national-insurance contributions, according to a government online tax calculator. That’s 22,600 pounds more than the current amount and doesn’t include the elimination of tax relief on the first 6,000 pounds of earnings and the reduction of breaks for pension contributions that Darling is also introducing.
About 350,000 people in the U.K. earn more than 150,000 pounds annually, according to the London-based Institute for Fiscal Studies. About 750,000 make more than 100,000 pounds, and their taxes will also increase after the government scrapped a personal tax-free allowance.
“There is a populist side to this message: Let’s over-tax the rich,” said French-born Philippe Houchois, 45, an analyst in London for Zurich-based UBS AG. The state is encouraging this anger “against banks, against the financial sector.”
Poll Shows Support
The proposal, part of the 2010 budget, is likely to go ahead after Conservative Party leader David Cameron said April 24 that reversing the 50 percent rate wasn’t a priority. About 57 percent of Britons have a “positive view” of the plan, a Populus Ltd. poll published the same day showed. Populus surveyed 518 adults after the April 22 budget speech.
Brown isn’t without supporters in the finance industry.
“We do have a major crisis,” said Bill Blain, a bond broker at KNG Securities LLP in London. “Taxes do need to rise. People in that bracket do need to pay.”
Fleeing bankers may find that taxes are also going up elsewhere. President Barack Obama wants to let the top two U.S. tax brackets increase to 36 percent and 39.6 percent from 33 percent and 35 percent. The top U.S. rate kicks in at $372,950.
Lower Taxes Elsewhere
Countries such as Singapore, where the top rate is 20 percent, and Switzerland have lower taxes. A single banker living in London and earning 350,000 pounds would pay about 40,000 pounds more under the new system than he would in Zurich, according to British and Swiss government figures.
“People are questioning their operations in London,” said Steven Bell, chief economist at the GLC Ltd. hedge fund in London. He was a U.K. Treasury official the last time a Labour government decided to raise taxes on high earners in 1976. The numbers leaving “will be significant,” Bell said.
The move reverses policies dating from former Prime Minister Tony Blair’s election in 1997 that rejected income-tax increases and encouraged wealth creation.
When the Labour Party was previously in power in the late 1970s under Prime Minister James Callaghan, the top tax rate was 83 percent on earned income and 98 percent on unearned income. These were cut to 60 percent and 75 percent when Margaret Thatcher took office in 1979. Blair said his party, re-branded as New Labour, wouldn’t return to the past.
Read more here
“There is no reason for me to stay here anymore,” said Efstathiou, a 38-year-old Cypriot who moved to London in 1990. “This tax increase is the last straw. This government is no longer interested in the City.”
Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s proposal to boost the tax rate to 50 percent from 40 percent on income above 150,000 pounds ($220,000) pushed headlines about “class warfare” onto the front pages of the capital’s newspapers. It also prompted predictions from business groups that it would undermine the U.K.’s competitiveness and lead to an exodus of financial talent. Brown was portrayed as Vladimir Lenin in a cartoon on Page One of the Daily Telegraph.
The income-tax change, set to take effect next year, would give the U.K. a higher top rate than Spain, Italy, Germany, France and the U.S., according to KPMG, the accounting firm. Among the 30 members of the Organization for Economic Co- operation and Development, the country would jump to seventh from 19th in the rankings of tax rates, accounting firm Ernst & Young said.
The initiative is part of the government’s efforts to contain a planned budget deficit of 12.4 percent of gross domestic product, Britain’s biggest in peacetime. The Treasury expects the tax to raise about 2.2 billion pounds next year when government borrowing will be 173 billion pounds. Darling’s budget calls for 703 billion pounds of deficits in the five years through April 2014.
How Increase Works
Under the new rates, a banker making 350,000 pounds would pay 160,000 pounds in income-tax and national-insurance contributions, according to a government online tax calculator. That’s 22,600 pounds more than the current amount and doesn’t include the elimination of tax relief on the first 6,000 pounds of earnings and the reduction of breaks for pension contributions that Darling is also introducing.
About 350,000 people in the U.K. earn more than 150,000 pounds annually, according to the London-based Institute for Fiscal Studies. About 750,000 make more than 100,000 pounds, and their taxes will also increase after the government scrapped a personal tax-free allowance.
“There is a populist side to this message: Let’s over-tax the rich,” said French-born Philippe Houchois, 45, an analyst in London for Zurich-based UBS AG. The state is encouraging this anger “against banks, against the financial sector.”
Poll Shows Support
The proposal, part of the 2010 budget, is likely to go ahead after Conservative Party leader David Cameron said April 24 that reversing the 50 percent rate wasn’t a priority. About 57 percent of Britons have a “positive view” of the plan, a Populus Ltd. poll published the same day showed. Populus surveyed 518 adults after the April 22 budget speech.
Brown isn’t without supporters in the finance industry.
“We do have a major crisis,” said Bill Blain, a bond broker at KNG Securities LLP in London. “Taxes do need to rise. People in that bracket do need to pay.”
Fleeing bankers may find that taxes are also going up elsewhere. President Barack Obama wants to let the top two U.S. tax brackets increase to 36 percent and 39.6 percent from 33 percent and 35 percent. The top U.S. rate kicks in at $372,950.
Lower Taxes Elsewhere
Countries such as Singapore, where the top rate is 20 percent, and Switzerland have lower taxes. A single banker living in London and earning 350,000 pounds would pay about 40,000 pounds more under the new system than he would in Zurich, according to British and Swiss government figures.
“People are questioning their operations in London,” said Steven Bell, chief economist at the GLC Ltd. hedge fund in London. He was a U.K. Treasury official the last time a Labour government decided to raise taxes on high earners in 1976. The numbers leaving “will be significant,” Bell said.
The move reverses policies dating from former Prime Minister Tony Blair’s election in 1997 that rejected income-tax increases and encouraged wealth creation.
When the Labour Party was previously in power in the late 1970s under Prime Minister James Callaghan, the top tax rate was 83 percent on earned income and 98 percent on unearned income. These were cut to 60 percent and 75 percent when Margaret Thatcher took office in 1979. Blair said his party, re-branded as New Labour, wouldn’t return to the past.
Read more here
Thursday, April 23, 2009
AutoNation CEO: Gas is too cheap
(Fortune) -- For most Americans, Topic A in the auto industry right now is the fate of GM. Mike Jackson, 60, the outspoken CEO of the nation's largest auto retailer, AutoNation, has some definite opinions about that subject--and we'll spell them out below. But his own Topic A today is the level of gas prices, which he thinks intolerably low. Here is the conversation that he and FORTUNE senior editor at large Carol Loomis had a few days ago.
Tell me your opinions about the price of gas and what might be done to influence it.
I think we need a revenue-neutral gas tax that puts a floor under the price of gasoline at around $3.50 to $4. The price of gas totally determines the types of vehicles that people buy and how they use them. The fact that America has ignored this reality is the reason why our energy policies have failed for 50 years. With gas now around $2 per gallon, it won't be possible to sell fuel-efficient vehicles. Already, another great migration away from them is underway. I've seen this movie three times in my career.
How would you establish a price floor?
Through taxation. But it doesn't need to happen by next month. If you simply announce that taxes will be put in after the economy recovers, in 2011 or 2012, people will start now to factor that into their decisions.
And how about your revenue-neutral point?
This would be a very painful, regressive tax, which needs to be rebated quickly--maybe through the payroll tax. If there's a rebate, I think the political backlash can be handled.
Read more here
Tell me your opinions about the price of gas and what might be done to influence it.
I think we need a revenue-neutral gas tax that puts a floor under the price of gasoline at around $3.50 to $4. The price of gas totally determines the types of vehicles that people buy and how they use them. The fact that America has ignored this reality is the reason why our energy policies have failed for 50 years. With gas now around $2 per gallon, it won't be possible to sell fuel-efficient vehicles. Already, another great migration away from them is underway. I've seen this movie three times in my career.
How would you establish a price floor?
Through taxation. But it doesn't need to happen by next month. If you simply announce that taxes will be put in after the economy recovers, in 2011 or 2012, people will start now to factor that into their decisions.
And how about your revenue-neutral point?
This would be a very painful, regressive tax, which needs to be rebated quickly--maybe through the payroll tax. If there's a rebate, I think the political backlash can be handled.
Read more here
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Glaxo Compares Sex Virus Shots, Delay Raises Eyebrows
(Bloomberg) -- GlaxoSmithKline Plc will release the first study to compare its cervical cancer vaccine with Merck & Co.’s blockbuster Gardasil, more than a year after completing the research.
Sales for Glaxo’s Cervarix amount to less than 10 percent of those garnered by Merck’s similar vaccine. The comparison study may influence which product doctors use and insurers pay for. It will be presented for the first time at a medical meeting in Malmoe, Sweden, on May 10, according to a draft of the program obtained by Bloomberg News.
The study also will help governments determine which of the vaccines to select for immunizing women, influencing a global market that Glaxo estimated at more than $10 billion last year. Glaxo’s shot, used less often than Gardasil in Europe, hasn’t won approval in the U.S., where Merck began selling its version three years ago.
Glaxo’s decision to wait 14 months to release the data and pick a little-known medical meeting as the venue “certainly has both my eyebrows up,” said Arthur Caplan, director of the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for Bioethics, in Philadelphia.
“Half the world is waiting to see which vaccine is the better one,” Caplan said. “You have a huge ethical obligation to get information out quickly. I’m never a fan of releasing key findings on a highly contentious issue, such as who’s got the better vaccine, at a relatively unknown meeting.”
The study concluded in March 2008, according to its listing on the U.S. government database that tracks clinical trials.
Two Studies
Cervarix and Gardasil protect women against the sexually transmitted human papillomavirus. The virus can lead to cervical cancer, which kills 250,000 women each year.
Stephen Rea, a spokesman for Glaxo in London, said the company chose the International Papillomavirus conference in Malmoe because it’s “internationally renowned and has a reputation for scientific rigor.”
Glaxo also plans to release another key Cervarix study, known as HPV-008, which tracks the effect of the vaccine on more than 18,600 women, at the meeting. U.S. regulators will use the findings to determine whether to clear the shot later this year. The company wanted to present the two studies “as a package,” Rea said. “Attendees will be able to see presentations on the efficacy study and the head-to-head study” together, he said.
Glaxo needs Cervarix to help offset cheaper generics that eroded U.S. sales of four medicines last year. Profit fell in the past two quarters at the London-based company.
‘Long Delay’
Glaxo shares have dropped 21 percent so far this year, the second-worst performance in a Bloomberg index of 18 European pharmaceutical companies. They fell 31.5 pence, 3 percent, to 1,019.5 pence in London trading, the biggest drop in a month.
Glaxo’s head-to-head study, dubbed HPV-010, measures which vaccine sparked a greater immune system response in more than 1,000 women seven months after the shot.
That means the results won’t say which product works best to keep cancer at bay, though it’s the first indication of the body’s ability to defend itself, said Aaron S. Kesselheim, an expert in pharmaceutical epidemiology and economics at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. As such, it will help governments decide which product to pick, Caplan said.
“I can’t explain the long delay,” Kesselheim said. “If you have positive results, wouldn’t you want to get it out? If it’s negative, people should know that soon. It’s concerning to me that the turnaround time for getting the data out there is so slow.”
Spitzer Settlement
Glaxo may have taken longer to analyze the research to see whether women were protected against other strains of the virus than the ones contained in the shot, according to Nick Turner, an analyst at Mirabaud Securities in London.
The company has won exclusive contracts to provide Cervarix to young girls and women in the Netherlands and the U.K. since the study was completed. A spokesman at the U.K. Department of Health did not return calls seeking comment. Saskia Hommes, a spokeswoman for the Dutch Ministry of Health, said Cervarix was “cost effective.”
One dose of Cervarix costs about 112 euros ($145) in Europe, compared with about 124 euros for Gardasil. Women need three injections to be protected.
Glaxo, Europe’s fifth-largest drugmaker, has come under fire before for not promptly disclosing study results. When the company found that its Avandia diabetes medicine raised the risk of heart attacks in 2005, it submitted the findings to regulators and posted them on its Web site. It didn’t notify doctors or patients.
Read more here
Sales for Glaxo’s Cervarix amount to less than 10 percent of those garnered by Merck’s similar vaccine. The comparison study may influence which product doctors use and insurers pay for. It will be presented for the first time at a medical meeting in Malmoe, Sweden, on May 10, according to a draft of the program obtained by Bloomberg News.
The study also will help governments determine which of the vaccines to select for immunizing women, influencing a global market that Glaxo estimated at more than $10 billion last year. Glaxo’s shot, used less often than Gardasil in Europe, hasn’t won approval in the U.S., where Merck began selling its version three years ago.
Glaxo’s decision to wait 14 months to release the data and pick a little-known medical meeting as the venue “certainly has both my eyebrows up,” said Arthur Caplan, director of the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for Bioethics, in Philadelphia.
“Half the world is waiting to see which vaccine is the better one,” Caplan said. “You have a huge ethical obligation to get information out quickly. I’m never a fan of releasing key findings on a highly contentious issue, such as who’s got the better vaccine, at a relatively unknown meeting.”
The study concluded in March 2008, according to its listing on the U.S. government database that tracks clinical trials.
Two Studies
Cervarix and Gardasil protect women against the sexually transmitted human papillomavirus. The virus can lead to cervical cancer, which kills 250,000 women each year.
Stephen Rea, a spokesman for Glaxo in London, said the company chose the International Papillomavirus conference in Malmoe because it’s “internationally renowned and has a reputation for scientific rigor.”
Glaxo also plans to release another key Cervarix study, known as HPV-008, which tracks the effect of the vaccine on more than 18,600 women, at the meeting. U.S. regulators will use the findings to determine whether to clear the shot later this year. The company wanted to present the two studies “as a package,” Rea said. “Attendees will be able to see presentations on the efficacy study and the head-to-head study” together, he said.
Glaxo needs Cervarix to help offset cheaper generics that eroded U.S. sales of four medicines last year. Profit fell in the past two quarters at the London-based company.
‘Long Delay’
Glaxo shares have dropped 21 percent so far this year, the second-worst performance in a Bloomberg index of 18 European pharmaceutical companies. They fell 31.5 pence, 3 percent, to 1,019.5 pence in London trading, the biggest drop in a month.
Glaxo’s head-to-head study, dubbed HPV-010, measures which vaccine sparked a greater immune system response in more than 1,000 women seven months after the shot.
That means the results won’t say which product works best to keep cancer at bay, though it’s the first indication of the body’s ability to defend itself, said Aaron S. Kesselheim, an expert in pharmaceutical epidemiology and economics at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. As such, it will help governments decide which product to pick, Caplan said.
“I can’t explain the long delay,” Kesselheim said. “If you have positive results, wouldn’t you want to get it out? If it’s negative, people should know that soon. It’s concerning to me that the turnaround time for getting the data out there is so slow.”
Spitzer Settlement
Glaxo may have taken longer to analyze the research to see whether women were protected against other strains of the virus than the ones contained in the shot, according to Nick Turner, an analyst at Mirabaud Securities in London.
The company has won exclusive contracts to provide Cervarix to young girls and women in the Netherlands and the U.K. since the study was completed. A spokesman at the U.K. Department of Health did not return calls seeking comment. Saskia Hommes, a spokeswoman for the Dutch Ministry of Health, said Cervarix was “cost effective.”
One dose of Cervarix costs about 112 euros ($145) in Europe, compared with about 124 euros for Gardasil. Women need three injections to be protected.
Glaxo, Europe’s fifth-largest drugmaker, has come under fire before for not promptly disclosing study results. When the company found that its Avandia diabetes medicine raised the risk of heart attacks in 2005, it submitted the findings to regulators and posted them on its Web site. It didn’t notify doctors or patients.
Read more here
Monday, April 20, 2009
Dalton to Urge Japanese Companies to Hire Outside Directors
(Bloomberg) -- Dalton Investments LLC, the Los Angeles-based hedge fund with 80 billion yen ($818 million) in assets, will urge the 70 Japanese companies it invests in to introduce outside directors to bolster corporate governance.
The fund, which invests 70 percent of its assets in Japan, will also ask the companies to boost shareholder returns by conducting share buybacks, Akihiko Miyata, managing director of Dalton’s local unit, said in an interview in Tokyo yesterday. The U.S. fund will send letters this month to nearly all of the companies in which it’s a shareholder, he said.
The move by Dalton, co-founded by James Rosenwald and Steven D. Persky in 1998, comes at a time when the Japanese government is trying to enhance the nation’s corporate governance standards to attract capital after the global credit crisis crimped corporate earnings, sending stock prices lower. The benchmark Nikkei 225 Stock Average has lost more than a third of its value in the past year amid the worst market rout since the Great Depression.
“I’m hoping that the letter will lead to increased opportunities for discussions with Japanese companies so that they can better understand what overseas investors are thinking,” said Miyata. “This isn’t about presenting a shareholder proposal,” he said, adding that taking a less- confrontational approach is more effective in bringing about change in Japan.
A panel led by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry aims to unveil a report in June that will urge changes to corporate law or listing rules to improve governance, Hiroaki Niihara, director of the trade ministry’s Corporate System Division, said in an interview last month. The Ministry of Justice and the nation’s stock exchanges are prepared to take action to enforce the recommendations once the report is completed, he said.
Read more here
The fund, which invests 70 percent of its assets in Japan, will also ask the companies to boost shareholder returns by conducting share buybacks, Akihiko Miyata, managing director of Dalton’s local unit, said in an interview in Tokyo yesterday. The U.S. fund will send letters this month to nearly all of the companies in which it’s a shareholder, he said.
The move by Dalton, co-founded by James Rosenwald and Steven D. Persky in 1998, comes at a time when the Japanese government is trying to enhance the nation’s corporate governance standards to attract capital after the global credit crisis crimped corporate earnings, sending stock prices lower. The benchmark Nikkei 225 Stock Average has lost more than a third of its value in the past year amid the worst market rout since the Great Depression.
“I’m hoping that the letter will lead to increased opportunities for discussions with Japanese companies so that they can better understand what overseas investors are thinking,” said Miyata. “This isn’t about presenting a shareholder proposal,” he said, adding that taking a less- confrontational approach is more effective in bringing about change in Japan.
A panel led by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry aims to unveil a report in June that will urge changes to corporate law or listing rules to improve governance, Hiroaki Niihara, director of the trade ministry’s Corporate System Division, said in an interview last month. The Ministry of Justice and the nation’s stock exchanges are prepared to take action to enforce the recommendations once the report is completed, he said.
Read more here
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Toshiba forecasts 2008 net loss of $3.5 billion
(MarketWatch) -- Toshiba Corp. said Friday it may have lost more money in the recently ended fiscal year than it had thought previously, raising its net loss estimate to 350 billion yen ($3.5 billion) from an earlier forecast of 280 billion yen.
However, Toshiba also lowered its operating loss, which doesn't include one-time charges and other special items. It now forecasts a 250 billion yen operating loss, compared to its previous projection of 280 billion yen. The disclosures were made by the company during the Tokyo Stock Exchange's midday recess Friday.
Expectation are for Toshiba to report a 269 billion yen net loss for the fiscal year that ended March 31, according to a consensus estimate of 15 analysts surveyed by Reuters.
The announcement followed a Nikkei newspaper report earlier in the day that said Toshiba was likely to revise down its operating loss estimate, owing to stabilizing prices for flash memory chips and other products, as well as strong contributions from its nuclear-power unit.
The Nikkei report was credited with helping boost Toshiba shares, which ended the morning session 4.4% higher.
Toshiba's cost cutting likely helped contain losses, while production cutbacks at its chip-making unit and by its rivals may have helped arrest declines in key product areas, including flash memory commonly used in digital music players, the report said.
Read more here
However, Toshiba also lowered its operating loss, which doesn't include one-time charges and other special items. It now forecasts a 250 billion yen operating loss, compared to its previous projection of 280 billion yen. The disclosures were made by the company during the Tokyo Stock Exchange's midday recess Friday.
Expectation are for Toshiba to report a 269 billion yen net loss for the fiscal year that ended March 31, according to a consensus estimate of 15 analysts surveyed by Reuters.
The announcement followed a Nikkei newspaper report earlier in the day that said Toshiba was likely to revise down its operating loss estimate, owing to stabilizing prices for flash memory chips and other products, as well as strong contributions from its nuclear-power unit.
The Nikkei report was credited with helping boost Toshiba shares, which ended the morning session 4.4% higher.
Toshiba's cost cutting likely helped contain losses, while production cutbacks at its chip-making unit and by its rivals may have helped arrest declines in key product areas, including flash memory commonly used in digital music players, the report said.
Read more here
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Abbott loses sales momentum; shares fall
(Reuters) - Abbott Laboratories Inc Wednesday reported lower-than-expected quarterly sales, hurt by generic competition for its Depakote anti-seizure drug, but one-time gains and demand for stents drove profit higher.
Abbott's traditionally strong sales momentum came to a standstill in the first quarter, as the stronger dollar battered overseas sales and compelled the company to temper its full-year revenue forecast for arthritis drug Humira.
"We're now seeing for the first time the real impact of the economic downturn (on) healthcare," Abbott Chief Executive Miles White told investors in a conference call. But White said Abbott was being "dented" rather than "hammered" by the downturn.
The drugmaker, whose shares fell 4.6 percent, said net income rose to $1.44 billion, or 92 cents per share, from $938 million, or 60 cents per share, a year earlier.
The results included a gain of $797 million after it was released from an obligation to make a payment to longtime partner Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd.
Excluding special items, the company earned 73 cents per shares. Analysts on average expected 70 cents, according to Reuters Estimates.
Global sales fell slightly to $6.72 billion, below the Reuters Estimates forecast of $7.07 billion.
Abbott said a stronger dollar, which reduces the value of overseas sales, crimped total revenue by 6.1 percentage points.
"Most of the sales shortfall came from U.S. pharmaceuticals, led by Humira, reflecting not only weaker markets, but a drawdown in inventories at the wholesaler and pharmacy level," JPMorgan analyst Michael Weinstein said in a research note.
Revenue from one-time blockbuster Depakote plunged by almost two thirds as U.S. doctors began opting for cheaper copycats. Sales of Abbott's Kaletra treatment for HIV were also significantly lower, hurt by new competition.
The revenue trend represents at least a temporary reversal of fortune for Abbott, whose sales jumped 10 percent in the fourth quarter and made the company an industry standout in terms of profit growth.
Despite the new challenges, Abbott said it still expects full-year earnings of $3.65 to $3.70 per share, excluding special items. That would represent profit growth of as much as 11.4 percent over last year.
The suburban Chicago company forecast earnings of 87 cents to 89 cents per share for the second quarter.
Abbott does not need to make major acquisitions to prop up its revenue and profits, White said.
"I don't feel the need to run out and do a deal to sustain what we've promised to shareholders," said White, who noted Abbott will remain "opportunistic" about small and mid-sized deals. Recent reports that Abbott had competed to acquire U.S. drugmaker Wyeth were false, White said.
Read more at CNNMoney
Abbott's traditionally strong sales momentum came to a standstill in the first quarter, as the stronger dollar battered overseas sales and compelled the company to temper its full-year revenue forecast for arthritis drug Humira.
"We're now seeing for the first time the real impact of the economic downturn (on) healthcare," Abbott Chief Executive Miles White told investors in a conference call. But White said Abbott was being "dented" rather than "hammered" by the downturn.
The drugmaker, whose shares fell 4.6 percent, said net income rose to $1.44 billion, or 92 cents per share, from $938 million, or 60 cents per share, a year earlier.
The results included a gain of $797 million after it was released from an obligation to make a payment to longtime partner Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd.
Excluding special items, the company earned 73 cents per shares. Analysts on average expected 70 cents, according to Reuters Estimates.
Global sales fell slightly to $6.72 billion, below the Reuters Estimates forecast of $7.07 billion.
Abbott said a stronger dollar, which reduces the value of overseas sales, crimped total revenue by 6.1 percentage points.
"Most of the sales shortfall came from U.S. pharmaceuticals, led by Humira, reflecting not only weaker markets, but a drawdown in inventories at the wholesaler and pharmacy level," JPMorgan analyst Michael Weinstein said in a research note.
Revenue from one-time blockbuster Depakote plunged by almost two thirds as U.S. doctors began opting for cheaper copycats. Sales of Abbott's Kaletra treatment for HIV were also significantly lower, hurt by new competition.
The revenue trend represents at least a temporary reversal of fortune for Abbott, whose sales jumped 10 percent in the fourth quarter and made the company an industry standout in terms of profit growth.
Despite the new challenges, Abbott said it still expects full-year earnings of $3.65 to $3.70 per share, excluding special items. That would represent profit growth of as much as 11.4 percent over last year.
The suburban Chicago company forecast earnings of 87 cents to 89 cents per share for the second quarter.
Abbott does not need to make major acquisitions to prop up its revenue and profits, White said.
"I don't feel the need to run out and do a deal to sustain what we've promised to shareholders," said White, who noted Abbott will remain "opportunistic" about small and mid-sized deals. Recent reports that Abbott had competed to acquire U.S. drugmaker Wyeth
Read more at CNNMoney
U.S. stock futures slip after Intel's outlook
(MarketWatch) -- U.S. stock futures edged lower on Wednesday, with Intel's cautious outlook giving further ammunition for bears after two straight losses.
S&P 500 futures fell nine-tenths of a point to 839.20 and Nasdaq 100 futures fell 9.5 points to 1,314.50. Futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 23 points.
U.S. stocks dropped on Tuesday after a surprising retail sales drop and as traders sold Goldman Sachs shares after a $5 billion stock offering. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 137 points, the S&P 500 dropped 17 points and the Nasdaq Composite lost 27 points.
Intel fell 4% in Frankfurt as the company projected sales to be roughly flat from the first quarter and gross margins in the mid-40s, which were disappointing to some analysts who were expecting a bounce in the second quarter.
The company's first-quarter profit fell 55%, which wasn't as steep as forecast.
Also on the tech front, Infosys Technologies dropped in Bombay trade as the software giant said it expects its first-ever decline in annual earnings and revenue.
EBay rose 2% in Frankfurt as the online auctioneer said it would spin off its Skype unit via an initial public offering.
Elsewhere, UBS dropped 3.7% in Zurich after the Swiss bank said it would lose $1.8 billion in the first quarter and cut its workforce by 8,700 after seeing outflows.
Sanofi-Aventis said it's going to buy privately held cancer drug maker BiPar Sciences for as much as $500 million. Abbott Labs is among the firms reporting results on Wednesday.
On the economics calendar, traders will be watching the release of March consumer price inflation data at 8:30 a.m. Eastern. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch produced a consensus forecast of a 0.1% drop following a 0.4% rise in February.
Read more at MarketWatch
S&P 500 futures fell nine-tenths of a point to 839.20 and Nasdaq 100 futures fell 9.5 points to 1,314.50. Futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 23 points.
U.S. stocks dropped on Tuesday after a surprising retail sales drop and as traders sold Goldman Sachs shares after a $5 billion stock offering. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 137 points, the S&P 500 dropped 17 points and the Nasdaq Composite lost 27 points.
Intel fell 4% in Frankfurt as the company projected sales to be roughly flat from the first quarter and gross margins in the mid-40s, which were disappointing to some analysts who were expecting a bounce in the second quarter.
The company's first-quarter profit fell 55%, which wasn't as steep as forecast.
Also on the tech front, Infosys Technologies dropped in Bombay trade as the software giant said it expects its first-ever decline in annual earnings and revenue.
EBay rose 2% in Frankfurt as the online auctioneer said it would spin off its Skype unit via an initial public offering.
Elsewhere, UBS dropped 3.7% in Zurich after the Swiss bank said it would lose $1.8 billion in the first quarter and cut its workforce by 8,700 after seeing outflows.
Sanofi-Aventis said it's going to buy privately held cancer drug maker BiPar Sciences for as much as $500 million. Abbott Labs is among the firms reporting results on Wednesday.
On the economics calendar, traders will be watching the release of March consumer price inflation data at 8:30 a.m. Eastern. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch produced a consensus forecast of a 0.1% drop following a 0.4% rise in February.
Read more at MarketWatch
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Debswana to reopen some Botswana mines on Wednesday
(Reuters) - Debswana, the world's biggest diamond producing company by value, said on Tuesday it would resume production on Wednesday at three of its four mines in Botswana, after suspending output due to weak demand.
A global economic slowdown has slashed demand for diamonds, leading to output cuts in Botswana, and led to a large budget deficit for the country after revenue dried up.
Debswana, a 50/50 joint venture between the government of Botswana and De Beers, which is 45 percent owned by mining group Anglo American, said in February it would close its Orapa, Letlhakane and Jwaneng mines from February 25 to April 14.
On Tuesday, Debswana said in a statement production at the firm's fourth and smallest mine, Damtshaa and at Orapa No. 2 plant would remain suspended for the rest of the year because demand was expected to be depressed.
The closures had cut production costs and preserved jobs, and given the company a chance to sell off some of the diamonds that had piled up in its inventories, it said.
Read more at Reuters
A global economic slowdown has slashed demand for diamonds, leading to output cuts in Botswana, and led to a large budget deficit for the country after revenue dried up.
Debswana, a 50/50 joint venture between the government of Botswana and De Beers, which is 45 percent owned by mining group Anglo American, said in February it would close its Orapa, Letlhakane and Jwaneng mines from February 25 to April 14.
On Tuesday, Debswana said in a statement production at the firm's fourth and smallest mine, Damtshaa and at Orapa No. 2 plant would remain suspended for the rest of the year because demand was expected to be depressed.
The closures had cut production costs and preserved jobs, and given the company a chance to sell off some of the diamonds that had piled up in its inventories, it said.
Read more at Reuters
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)